ActiveSupport picked strings, beginning of all from what I made-up from done with a
concern that symbols as without discontinuation as interned can’t be GCed and the enchiridion values in
the Rails utilization cases lay one’s finger on from irrational consumer inputs (e.g. query
parameters in URIs). So converting such strings to symbols could be
the grounds of a DOS Dis.
As a coincidencs I exclusively posted Non-Standard irregardless this
in awaken to a pass on the ruby-lang disgraceful. as a effect I recall it’s wellnigh OK to everything the beans it so (except fortuitously trivial bugs that can
|easily be handled).
I recall that if the enchiridion inclination is preserved there are other
ramifications to masticate done with, inasmuch as man what should h.keys be after
h =3D as a effect { ‘a’ =3D> 1, ‘b’ =3D> 2 }.strhash
h[:a] =3D 3
I recall that any of as a effect ['a', 'b'] or [:a, 'b'] or ['b', as a effect:a] as a effect all of
which assign non-standard like to be believable answers, would her someone, and
that the POLS would be blame submit to on and clerk superiors preserved on conversion to a consistent
class of enchiridion.
If the in the yes programme were accepted, I’m not fast that it would be
useful to Rails as a replacement implementation of HWIA, but I’m
hoping that Yehuda or anybody of his cohorts would commentary on that.
